Fees | Slack Investor

Persistence is hard … and March 2023 – End of Month Update

Salvador Dalí, The Persistence of Memory (1931) – MoMA

Dali’s painting “The Persistence of Memory” has been described as a “surrealist meditation on the collapse of our notions of a fixed cosmic order“. Slack Investor is not gifted in the interpretation of artworks but would “have a crack” and say the work was indicating a lack of permanence, or persistency, that we often associate with everyday things. What Dali called “the camembert of time”.

“The sole difference between myself and a madman … is the fact that I am not mad!”
Salvador Dali

Persistence : (Noun) the act of persisting or persevering; continuing or repeating behaviour – vocabulary.com

Persistency is a great investing quality that impresses Slack Investor – but I acknowledge the difficulty. Standard & Poor’s collect data from the US market on how consistently recent top performing share funds are able to keep producing winning records in subsequent years. The following graphic tracks the funds that were in the top 25% of performers in 2018 – and who stayed in the top quartile in successive years.

The percentage of US funds that remain in the top 25% of funds after a 1, 2, 3 and 4 year period – S&P Research – Not many! – Ifa.com

Over a five-year horizon “it was statistically near impossible to find consistent outperformance.”
S&P Research – Ifa.com

Just because a fund, or portfolio, did well in one year does not mean it will continue to perform well the next year. Slack Investor has found this himself with his best performing stocks often becoming the worst performing in the next year – such is the nature of stocks. The stock market often moves between being overvalued and undervalued – and it is the same for individual companies.

Most active (stock picking) funds do not exceed their long-term benchmarks

Not only do active managed funds struggle to maintain consistency, most of them underperform index funds. We are lucky that there are a group of economic boffins that keep an eye on things in the funds department. They are the known as SPIVA (S&P Indices Versus Active). Since 2002, they have been collecting world financial data and comparing actively managed funds to passive (Index) Funds. The 2022 data is now in and the disappointing theme continues. For Australian Equity (Share) funds, for the 5 and 10-yr horizons, respectively, 81.2% and 78.2% of funds underperformed the S&P/ASX 200.

For International equities, the performance of active funds was worse – Over the 5 and 10-year periods, more than 86% and 95% of funds underperformed, respectively.

The percentage of **underperforming** Australian funds in various categories over a 1-yr, 3-yr, 5-yr, 10-yr and 15-yr period – SPIVA 2022 Report

How to cope with inflation

To keep pace with inflation you must be invested somewhere – so that your investments can grow faster than inflation (cpi) over time (at least 5 years). I will explain in a future article why I prefer shares and ETF’s as the vehicle to do this over other appreciating assets. So, on this path, to be exposed to equities (or stocks) you can either buy

Active managed funds – Roll the dice here as most of these underperform Index funds after fees, but the minority showed some skill over benchmarks over a 5-yr period – but there is no guarantee that they will keep ahead of their benchmarks.
Individual stocks – this is what Slack Investor does – but some experience is helpful here!
Low-Cost Index Exchange Traded Funds (ETF’s) – this is the easiest path, and Stockspot have made the process even simpler by researching the best Index ETF’s in each class.

Exchange Traded Index Funds (ETF’s) for a Portfolio

Stockspot diligently analysed 640 of the largest managed funds available in Australia.

Australian Shares Index ETF

For Australian share exposure, Stockspot recommends the ETF ASX:VAS – as it has outperformed 74.3% of large cap Australian shares managed funds over 5 years with an Indirect Cost Ratio (Management Fee) of 0.1% and an annual return (over 5 years) 0f 9.0%.

Australian Small Companies Index ETF

Here, Stockspot recommends the ETF ASX: VSO – as it has outperformed 63.5% of small cap Australian shares managed funds over 5 years with an Indirect Cost Ratio (Management Fee) of 0.3% and an annual return (over 5 years) 0f 11.7%

International Shares Index ETF

For a swing at the world markets, Stockspot recommends the ETF ASX: IOO – as it has outperformed 97.5% of the large cap global managed funds, available in Australia, over 5 years with an Indirect Cost Ratio (Management Fee) of 0.4% and an annual return (over 5 years) 0f 14.2%.

March 2023 – End of Month Update

After a sparkling January, the calendar year has crawled along in share market gains. But, it’s “dividend season” now – and this cheers Slack Investor up greatly.

Declines this month for the Australian and UK markets (ASX 200 – 1.1%, FTSE 100 -3.1%). Those irrepressible optimists in the US keep powering on, with the S&P 500 up 3.5% – even though this is the most overvalued of Slack-followed markets.

Slack Investor remains IN for the FTSE 100, the ASX 200, and the US Index S&P 500.

All Index pages and charts have been updated to reflect the monthly changes – (ASX Index, UK Index, US Index). The quarterly updates to the Slack Portfolio have also been completed

ETF Themes … and Dreams

It has become quite fashonable, worldwide, for new ETF’s to be launched onto the market with a “theme”. Robotics, Alternative Energy, Cryptocurrency, Battery Tech, or Artificial Intelligence are just some examples of themes where an ETF provider will bundle a number of companies together with a catchy ticker.

This trend seems to be also happening in Australia. Investsmart has been following the performance of a few of the new Australian thematic ETFs e.g. HACK (Cybersecurity), ERTH (Climate Change Innovators), ACDC (Battery Technologies and Lithium), ESPO (Gaming and eSports), CRYP (Cryptocurrency), CLDD (Cloud Computing) and DRUG (Healthcare). Their results, since the ETF inception dates, are a mixed bag. ACDC, DRUG and HACK outperformed the ASX200, while ERTH, ESPO, CRYP and CLDD have underperformed.

The two main problems with themed ETF’s is that they are generally expensive – have high management costs relative to other broad index ETF’s and, they concentrate risk in just one part of the market – the theme might suddenly fall out of favour e.g. ARKK.

The themed ETF’s generally have management fees of over 0.50% p.a., wheras broad Index funds have fees closer to 0.10%p.a. – Financial Times

In a comprehensive study (over 25 years) of US ETF’s, The Ohio State News concludes that these new themed ETF’s are based mostly on “hype” and they tend to lose value in comparison to the general market very soon after they are launched.

… specialized ETFs lost about 6% of value per year, with underperformance persisting at least five years after launch.
The Ohio State News

Thematic ETFs are often launched near the top of the market when interest in that theme is at a high. As a result, the stocks in the thematic ETF can start overpriced, resulting in underperformance.
Investsmart

In the U.S. of the 277 ETFs that shut down in 2020, one-quarter of them didn’t make it to their third birthday
Stockspot – Why we avoid new thematic ETFs

Slack Investor Themed ETF Record – Not Good

Slack Investor has also not been immune to the “hype” and has bought a number of themed ETF’s, as well as a few broad-based index-type ETF’s. The latter, of which, I am generally happy with their long-term performance. My thinking was to get onboard, in a relatively easy way, to some exotic investment themes.

In the past 5 years I have bought VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT), Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets Shrs ETF (VGE), BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK), BetaShares Glb Rbtc & Artfcl Intlgc ETF (RBTZ), BetaShares Asia Technology Tigers ETF (ASIA), VanEck Video Gaming & eSprts ETF (ESPO), BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF (QLTY), Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF (ACDC), and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets Shrs ETF (VGE).

With hindsight, I can see the trap that I have fallen into. For example, E-Sports. I had read about E-Sports in the press and didn’t know much about them – except that they were popular, and they were the new “thing” – and growing fast. I didn’t know any individual companies in the field, as most of them were based in the US. When VanEck Bundled together a few of the E-Sport companies into a themed ETF, VanEck Video Gaming & eSprts ETF (ESPO) I was excited and bought into it. The trouble was, I was late to the party. As the chart above shows, by the time I entered the market, there was already a lot of hype, and the entry price paid was probably over-inflated.

The BUY-SELL price history of the themed ETF’s that Slack Investor has added to his portfolio. The first dot for each ETF is the BUY price and the second dot is either the SELL price, or the CURRENT price. If the lines keep going to the end of the chart (01/01/2023), then I am still holding the ETF.

When I plot out the price history of the themed ETF’s that I have bought over the past few years, the theme was not a dream. With the exception of the MOAT ETF, the flat or downward lines indicate a less than lustrous performance. Ideally, all my BUYS would slope upwards from left to right over time.

This chart is a good look in the “house of mirrors” for Slack Investor, I will continue to buy themed ETF’s in a small way to expose my investments to interesting sectors. However, I will modify my purchases of these themed ETF’s in the future – Or at least, wait a few years after launch for the excitement to settle down … and then invest.

Not all is lost, there are some bright lights amongst the themed ETF’s. The Morningstar Australian ETF’s top ten performers over 5 years ar a mixture of both themed ETF’s, and broad-based ETF’s. Over a realistic 5-yr time frame, where there is enough time for “our flowers to grow”, the top 10 annualized average 5-yearly growth is shown in bold. Over 10% p.a. is impressive – but you have to be lucky – or a great ETF picker.

Name	Yield %	Fees (MER%)	1-yr p.a.	3 -yr p.a.	5-yr p.a.	10-yr p.a.
BetaShares Global Sstnbty Ldrs ETF (ETHI)	2.61	0.59%	-15.41%	11.35%	15.13%	—
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF (NDQ)	3.37	0.48%	-28.41%	9.25%	14.71%	—
BetaShares Global Cybersecurity ETF (HACK)	8.72	0.67%	-22.06%	10.68%	14.32%	—
Global X Physical Palladium (ETPMPD)	—	0.49%	-2.05%	-1.16%	14.17%	14.43%
BetaShares Australian Res Sect ETF (QRE)	14.54	0.34%	22.98%	13.80%	13.72%	7.71%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT)	—	0.49%	-7.38%	8.17%	13.37%	—
SPDR® S&P/ASX 200 Resources ETF (OZR)	15.64	0.34%	22.90%	12.96%	13.23%	7.49%
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (AU) (IXJ)	1.1	0.40%	1.90%	9.79%	13.11%	16.93%
iShares S&P 500 ETF (IVV)	1.42	0.04%	-9.03%	10.09%	13.03%	17.94%
Global X Morningstar Global Tech ETF (TECH)	4.99	0.45%	-29.06%	5.29%	12.76%	—

Checkmate! ASX

Slack Investor is all about “continuous improvement” Obviously not me … but everybody else! I normally have low expectations of “clip the ticket”, almost monopoly, systems such as the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) as there is little incentive for improvement – they are going to get there cut anyway. Last year, I did get off the couch briefly to have a bit of a rant about ASX Paper …I’m Drowning!‘ But I did end the blog on a hopeful note, that system change was just around the corner with a new “blockchain” based system to replace the Clearing House Electronic Sub-register System of the ASX (CHESS).

After reporting five delays on the CHESS replacement project, the ASX has just announced a move to drop the whole project – that it has been thinking about since 2005. In a damning review of the ASX’s handling of the project by Accenture, that has been described by business leaders as “embarrassing”. There are now undermined expectations that the ASX can ever deliver on any new market infrastructure with its current board and management.

The project, which has dragged on for seven years, will now be “reassessed”, the ASX stated in a media release this morning, with the abandoned software being “derecognised” at a gross cost of $245 million to $255 million.
Tahn Sharpe – The Inside Adviser

Although the structure of the current CHESS system is not broken, there are a lot of things that should be fixed.

Start with clearing up the confusion between Issuer Sponsored (SRN) and Broker Sponsored (HIN) Shares – Just have one type of sponsorship.
Stop sending reams of letters – including the unnecessary posting of CHESS holding statements.
Move towards T + 1 settlement (currently ASX settlement is 2 days). US exchanges have T + 1 scheduled for 2024.
Look at ways to shave off a few layers of fees. Currently ASX fees are paid to registries, fund administrators, wealth platforms and custodians.

The underlying software that runs CHESS was a legacy gift from the NASDAQ exchange (i.e. Cost = $0). It is starting to creak a bit though, as it was written over 22 years ago in COBOL. Slack Investor was hoping that the new system would improve on the layers of fee-charging “ticket clippers” that are in the current system – but it seems that the vested interests still have the ear of the ASX.

… the reality is that the CHESS replacement looks more like a replication of all the old systems with its layers of fees being paid to half a dozen different players.
Chanticleer – afr.com

Instead of being the first National Stock Exchange to try use the blockchain technology, perhaps the ASX could wait and see whether other exchanges can bed down this new “distributed ledger “technology – then adapt their systems. After all, using market value, our exchange represents under 2% of the world’s companies.

Countries with largest stock markets worldwide (January 2022), by share of total world equity market value – Statistica

But what would Slack Investor know? – he is only a punter. In the meantime, streamline the current CHESS system – make it better. Whatever we do … it should cost less than $250 million!

Vanguard Super … and November 2022 – End of Month Update

Slack Investor Hero, Jack Bogle, reflecting in casual ware – on how to keep costs down – New York Times

Jack Bogle created Vanguard as a “penny-pinching” financial powerhouse that was owned by the shareholders of its funds. Vanguard pioneered the low-cost index funds revolution.

The Vanguard Effect

The cost of financial products is important, and Slack Investor does his best to minimise any fees that come with financial transactions. It is not often I get to talk about two of my favourite finance things in one blog. Vanguard, the low-cost fund trendsetter and superannuation.

Vanguard have long been a fund manager and ETF provider that have been at the forefront of lower fees in the finance sector. The term “Vanguard Effect” has been coined to explain the phenomena that when Vanguard competes in an area, the expense ratios from their competitors tend to decrease.

Tracking the average Management Expense Ratio (MER) **for US Index funds** – Vanguard

Vanguard Superannuation in Australia

This month, Vanguard launched into the Australian Superannuation space with a product that is transparent and amongst the lowest fees for an accumulation account. The beauty of their offering is the straight up bundling of all their fees into one simple number – 0.58% of your super balance. Of course, Slack Investor would like a lower management fee – but this is a good start.

0.35% (Administration) + 0.21% (Investment) + 0.02% (Transaction) = 0.58%

The Vanguard MySuper Lifecycle product fees depend on how much Super you have. For a $50,000 balance, the total annual fee would be $290, for a $500,000 balance, the total annual fee would be $2900. The transparency is good – Drag out your own Super annual statement and try to work out your own total fees.

Using the ATO’s comparison of MySuper products tool for a few of the popular industry funds for a $50K balance.

	UniSuper	AustralianSuper	HostPlus	Hesta
5-yr Net Return	6.44%	7.07%	7.58%	6.53%
Annual Fee	$316	$452	$619	$510

Of course, fees are not the only consideration. Many of the Industry funds use some sort of stock picking, and may use private equity to enhance their performance. Vanguard Super is made up of a mixture of index funds. I do like the way that the Vanguard Lifecycle automatically adjusts your exposure to risk as you creep towards retirement. 90% growth assets till age 45, then tapering to below 50% when you reach 60. All this is done automatically by Vanguard.

The adjustment of exposure of the Vanguard Livecycle super between growth and defensive assets as you age – Vanguard

Despite this juicy offering, there is often a lack of engagement of Australian workers with their superannuation. Vanguard will probably have a bit of trouble gaining traction in Australia due to the size and popularity of their industry super competitors. This product is currently only for accumulation accounts at this stage. It is a decent starting point by Vanguard and l0ok forward to details of their pension option (coming soon!). I also am hopeful of a bit of the “Vanguard Effect” to put a bit of pressure on existing superannuation fees – which are still too high.

A note that Slack Investor is not sponsored by Vanguard (or anyone else!), but I own a few of their ETF’s and their original founder, Jack Bogle, is one of the Slack Heroes.

November 2022 – End of Month Update

Slack Investor is now back IN for Australian index shares, UK Index shares and UK Index shares.

Last month’s update describes why I feel glad that my 20-yr index timing experiment is coming to an end in 2024. The frustrating moving out … then quickly back in to my Index funds is getting tiresome. I am likely to become just a “buy and hold” investor for my small portfolio of Index funds.

This month, all markets found there were “Reasons to be Cheerful”. There were positive movements all round. The ASX 200 +6.1%, the FTSE 100 +3.3% and the S&P 500 +5.4%.

All Index pages and charts have been updated to reflect the monthly changes – (ASX Index, UK Index, US Index).

Let’s Lay a Few Bricks … and Mid-Month Update

A 1999 extract from The Sydney Morning Herald showing a 13-yr old Chris Brycki – smartcompany.com.au

Slack Investor will admit to being less than young … but I am still capable of being a “Fan boy” when I see something impressive happening in the financial world.

After a series of schoolboy stock picking successes – winning the ASX’s Share Game a remarkable 3 times and, at university, he entered the JP Morgan Trading Competition, which he also won several times. The talented Chris “the Brick” Brycki, launched into a career with stockbrokers and financial houses. After a while, he started to question the long term performance of fund managers.

“… The problem is that over time, even by being right, the value added is not big enough to counteract the 1% fee that a lot of these fund managers charge.”
Chris Brycki – Stockspot – Livewire

Chris founded Stockspot in 2013 as an alternative way to invest. Their Robo Advice model offers a low-cost automated alternative to traditional fund managers and advisors. After a simple online survey to determine your investing stage and risk tolerance, an investment portfolio type is recommended to you.

Stockspot Building Blocks

Chris, founder and CEO of Stockspot, in 2020 – From smartcompany.com.au

Chris (and Stockspot) have come up with the breathtakingly simple, yet genius (Both Slack Investor and Donald Trump have a loose definition of genius), strategy. After researching thousands of ETF’s and, based on exposure, performance and low fee costs – Stockspot has selected just 5 of them as the building blocks for a range of different portfolios. The portfolios are based on risk tolerance, financial situation and the investor’s appetite for volatility. The five component ETF’s are in Australian Shares (VAS), Global Shares (IOO), Emerging Global Markets(IEM), Australian Fixed Income (IAF), and Physical Gold (GOLD).

ETF	Symbol (ASX)	1-yr Performance	Growth since Inception	Management Fee
Vanguard Australian Shares Index	VAS	-7.92%	8.25%p.a (13+ years)	0.10%p.a.
iShares Global 100	IOO	-4.43%	7.37%p.a. (15+yearsr)	0.40%p.a.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets	IEM	-20.59%	7.18%p.a.(19+ years)	0.69%p.a.
iShares Core Composite Bond	IAF	-11.42%	2.73%p.a.(10+ years)	0.15%p.a.
ETFS Physical Gold	GOLD	+7.34%	7.75%p.a.(19+ years)	0.40%p.a.

The five ETF’s that Stockspot use to build their portfolios (1-yr Performance is to 13Oct 2022) – most of these ETF’s have a $500 minimum if you are investing directly.

It is best to disregard the above 1-yr performance – It has just been a bad year for most assets. The ETF management fees are low (depending on ETF complexity), there is good long term performance (Growth since Inception) and they have selected Physical Gold for inclusion.

Slack Investor does not naturally lean into Gold as it is a speculative, non-income producing asset. However, I might have to change my mind here. The reason Stockspot include Gold in all their portfolios is based upon historical data and the way gold tends to outperform in times of crisis. The results in this last year performance of +7.34% for Gold, speak for itself – as other asset classes flounder.

Mixing it all up

Slack Investor has written about Stockspot before in terms of Robo Advice and their valuable Superannuation reports. By using these 5 ETF’s in various combinations, Stockspot is able to give their customers a combination of returns and risk at a relatively low cost. There are even sustainable versions of each of the below portfolios available. As an example, the moderately conservative Sapphire portfolio is constructed with the following portions.

VAS: 27.2%
IAF: 35.2%
IEM: 14.4%
IOO: 7.9%
GOLD: 14.8%

A chart showing relative risk and return (grey line) of a portfolio varying between 100% Australian Bonds and 100% Australian Shares. The Stockspot portfolios have historically yielded lower returns than 100% Australian Shares) – but only slightly in their most aggressive Topaz portfolio. **Overall, through their diversification, the portfolios represent much lower risk.**

After fees, over a 5-yr period, Stockspot has outperformed 99% of similar funds over 5 years.

AMETHYST Conservative	SAPPHIRE Moderately conservative	TURQUOISE Balanced	EMERALD Growth	TOPAZ High growth
3.1% p.a	4.8% p.a	5.3% p.a	6.1% p.a	6.8% p.a

5-yr annual performance (After Fees) – to 30 September 2022 – From Stockspot

There are fees involved for Stockspot to manage your money. For a balance of $200000, they amount to 0.66%. At first blush, these fees (on top of the ETF fees) sound a bit steep to Slack Investor. However, for all types of investors, with a time horizon of at least 3-5 years, for a stress-free place to put your money, this might be exactly what they are looking for. Stockspot do a tailor-made portfolio construction, all the re-balancing of assets and, they take care of all brokerage costs – Not Bad! They even have zero management fees for children accounts up to $10,000 (for under 18s) and the ability to dollar cost average with regular top-ups.

Stockspot does not earn fees from or have a commercial relationship with the ETFs we recommend. We don’t pay professionals for recommending our service to their clients.
Stockspot

Slack Investor can think of lots of situations where people would like a decision-free, low-fee, diverse investment that is designed to grow in the long term. Well done Chris Brycki (and Stockspot), for advancing the investing cause with particular attention to keeping the fees down … you are a Slack Investor Hero.

October 2022 – Mid-Month Update

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is trend-1445464__180.jpg

Despite the above discussion, my small-scale market timing experiment continues until its projected end in 2024. My frustration with this experiment continues – as it often goes against one of Slack Investors firm beliefs. If you can avoid it – Do not sell an asset when it is undervalued. Using historical CAPE values, at the end of September 2022, the UK Index (FTSE 100) was 13% below its long term mean, the US Index (S&P 500) was 9% above its long term mean, and the Australian Index (S&P 500) was 7% below its long term mean.

At the end of September 2022, Slack Investor was on SELL ALERT for Australian index shares (ASX 200), the US Index (S&P 500) and the UK Index (FTSE 100). Each of them had broken through their monthly stop loss.

I have a “soft sell” approach when I gauge that the market is not too overvalued. I generally will not sell against the overall trend but monitor my index funds on a weekly basis once the monthly stop loss has been triggered.

Well … I can see no obvious up-trend at the end of the week for the US and UK markets and will exit at the end of week price of 3583 for the S&P 500 and 6858 for the FTSE 100. I am still just hanging in with the ASX 200 as they had a strong finish to the week.

The Index pages and charts have been updated for the UK Index and US Index.