
Slack Investor would have to say that getting old has several disadvantages. However, the Australian government is compensating for this – perhaps a little too much. Under the current ‘Intergenerational contract’ and our ‘tax transfer’ system – it pays to be old!
25 years ago, the 75+ age group’s post-tax income was only 75% of the average, but now it matches the average, indicating a significant shift. –(Source: ANU)
The Black line on the chart below, represents the net value (aggregate) of government taxes and services at each age. It is a good demonstration of how the Australian tax and transfer system works. A recent ANU Report shows that these transfers are part of the intergenerational contract where the working community ‘looks after’ the young and the old:

- When people are young, they pay relatively little tax and they receive services such as education.
- During working age, people typically pay more in taxes than they receive in services.
- After retirement, older Australians usually receive more in government benefits and services (age pension, aged care and health care) than they pay in taxes.
These principles are sound in a caring economy. However, there is something profoundly wrong with the whole Australian tax system where:
Australians over the age of 60 have enjoyed a post-tax income similar to that of mid-career working age Australians and much higher than Australians aged 18-30 –(Source: ANU)
The report describes how, in earlier periods, older Australians earned relatively little income while the tax and transfer system provided income and support. In recent years, Australian retirees generally have generated income from significant Real Estate and Superannuation accumulated wealth – and the Australian tax and transfer system has not adjusted.
We’re a country that overtaxes hard work that actually contributes to the economy and rewards those hoarding unproductive assets while contributing little back. – Tom Stelzer, Livewire
The Australian Budget is in a structural deficit – the cash balance will be negative in every year going forward! In the next few years, it will be necessary to increase taxes or reduce Government spending.
The ANU Report suggests that budget repair should include both a mix of tax increases and spending reductions on older Australians. The proportion of over 65s paying tax has halved in the last 20 years. Slack Investor is not one to eagerly put his hand up for extra taxes – but he can see the community benefit. He will take it on the chin when it happens.
December 2025 – End of Month and Year Update
Although December in the US was a flat month (S&P 500 +0.0%), there was a bit of a ‘Santa Rally’ this month for Australia and the UK. The ASX 200 was up 3.3% and the FTSE 100 up 2.2%. Slack Investor remains IN for the FTSE 100, the ASX 200, and the US Index S&P 500.
I haven’t yet done the full maths on the market yearly gains that include dividends. In raw terms (without dividends), for calendar year 2025 the ASX 200 was up 7%, the FTSE 100 up a magnificent 21%, and the S&P 500 up 16%.
Amongst all this positive news, the Slack Portfolio has had a negative calendar year and is down 3.1%. Slack Investor has good long-term performance and accepts the volatility of the stock market. He is not surprised by the odd bad year, but amongst all this background rising tide – it is just poor form!
The Ashley Owen graphic below shows one of the reasons for the Slack portfolio negative performance is that he has attached himself to some of the biggest losers of calendar year 2025 (CSL -35%, Goodman Group -17% and Wisetech -41%). My New Year’s resolution is to pay a bit more attention to the Slack Portfolio and try to turn things around.

All Index pages and charts have been updated to reflect the monthly changes – (ASX Index, UK Index, US Index). The quarterly updates to the Slack Portfolio have also been completed.
A technical note on the Slack Portfolio. Slack Investor has moved his Wesfarmers (WES) and Coles Group (COL) shares out of the growth-oriented Slack Portfolio because of their relatively weak projected growth (5%-10%). He remains a shareholder of these solid companies, but he has moved them into his Stable Income Fund – where they more comfortably sit.



































