Measurement … The Sweet Science Part 2

Lord Kelvin (1824-1907) – based on image from Wikimedia

 

Measuring your portfolio performance can do your head in … but Slack Investor thinks that it is important that you set aside a time to evaluate your investment performance at least once a year. I choose the end of the financial year in Australia (June 30) as a good time for these calculations … but you can chose your own date … and, if whatever you do, you do it consistently … you are going to be OK.

First of all … why measure? Lord Kelvin was a smart bloke – as discussed previously, measurement adds to our knowledge – By measuring your own portfolio performance you get an idea of how you are doing compared to other portfolios, share indicies, or managed funds. If you consistently underperform against other bench marks … then it might be time to become the ultimate Slack Investor and outsource your portfolio to Index funds.

Outsourcing into passive investment is not so bad … if the fees are kept low … “The Buff” , (aka Warren Buffet, the worlds greatest investor!)  has promised to give away 99% of his $65 billion fortune when he dies – the remainder of his fortune will be invested in bonds and index funds to support his wife and family.

My advice to the trustee could not be more simple: Put 10% of the cash in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund. (I suggest Vanguard’s.) I believe the trust’s long-term results from this policy will be superior to those attained by most investors – whether pension funds, institutions or individuals – who employ high-fee managers. from source

  1. Portfolio with no inflows or outflows

Lets start simply … supposing your have the most basic portfolio that reinvests its earnings with no external inflows (“cash in”, contributions, or transfer) and no external outflows (“cash out”, pension payment, or transfer) from your investment portfolio during the year and you want to do a performance calculation to benchmark yourself with other funds and investments. Most people can come up with a starting value and an ending value of their portfolios at the year (financial year) end – this includes the value of your stocks and any portfolio cash. Slack Investor prefers to calculate his returns before tax. So, tax credits such as franked dividends are included in his portfolio return.

Whatever happens inside this portfolio – buys and sells, dividends, interest, expenses, brokerage and fees – are just part of the portfolio business and will be reflected in its finishing value.

An Excel spreadsheet that will make this job easier is available on the Resources Page.

2. Portfolio with inflows and outflows – Approximation

However, for most real portfolios, there is money transferred into, or out of, your portfolio account during the year. Unlike the Beardstown Ladies, if you want to accurately portray how you are doing, it is imperative that you account for cash flows either in or out of your portfolio. If you want the least amount of work and you are willing to calculate your portfolio return approximately – the way below will work a treat. A net contributions figure is obtained (inflows – outflows) to give an ‘average’ amount of capital invested during the year and by subtracting 50% of net additions from the ending value and adding 50% to the beginning value – we get an approximate percentage return.

An Excel spreadsheet that that performs these calculations is available on the Resources Page.

Of course, in real life, rather than using averages, portfolio returns depend greatly in the timing of when you had capital available. The above is an approximation. Slack Investor chooses to go into more detail to reflect the time value of money for his portfolio. These intricate ways will be revealed in the last of this measurement series next month.

 

August 2017 – End of Month Update … and Fund Returns FY2017

Slack Investor remains IN for US, UK, and Australian index shares.

A steady month for all markets that I follow – Slack Investor stays on the couch and does nothing …

The Chant West media release  referred to in the previous monthly update has plenty of other useful information.

Fund Performance Results (Up to June 30, 2017)- Source Chant West

The above table quotes the median performance figures from various types of funds that Chant West monitors, ranging from All Growth to Conservative. As mentioned in a previous post, the 1-Yr column shows it has been a bumper year  for all types of funds – If you owned any growth fund during the last 7 years, you would be tremendously pleased with the 10% pa returns.

The GFC (Global Financial Crisis) of 2008 (and later years) continues to weigh down the ten year returns (4-5% for growth assets).

Over the last 25 years, Chant West found the returns of growth funds were a more reassuring 8.3%. It just drives home the devastating affect of a major downturn that an event like the GFC has on growth funds. The figures are, in the jargon of the industry,”net of investment fees and taxes” … but curiously before admin fees and advisor commissions … but this is another story!

Growth Funds – Rolling 5-Year Performance (Returns %pa) – Source Chant West

The above graph compares the growth category median (rolling 5-year) with the average return objective for growth funds – CPI (Consumer Price Index) plus 3.5%. This is a typical target for growth funds. In an environment where cash returns are mostly below 2% there is risk involved with investing in growth assets.

I never ever ever thought I would be quoting the far-right (recently) former Trump employee on this site.

“My old firm, Goldman Sachs – traditionally, the best banks are leveraged 8:1. When we had the financial crisis in 2008, the investment banks were leveraged 35:1.”
― Steve Bannon, Media Executive and former Investment Banker source

However, “Breitbart Steve”, after the fact, your quote rings true … the signs are always there …  Excessive borrowings (leveraging) and a willingness for people to pay top dollar for overvalued assets are sure signs that trouble is coming.

Slack Investor is comfortable with risk and would always prefer growth funds – especially with a large time horizon – but I will never be able to avoid ordinary fluctuations (corrections) in the stock market. A disciplined approach to stop losses should keep me out of the huge falls that the GFC presented to owners of shares.

Although valuations are generally high, Slack Investor does not see a bubble in the Australian or UK Stock Markets for now – Unlike the US market, Australian and UK share valuations are not too far higher than long term averages – and there has never been a calamitous fall in stock values without a bubble first. Regardless, my stop losses will protect me from huge losses of capital.

I have updated all Index pages and charts to reflect the end of month data.